Browse By

All posts by mlcleaver

After Owen Paterson. Who next?

In the past week it seems like a line in the sand has been drawn. The Owen Paterson affair ended in a complete u-turn by the government. While the MP could have got away with a slap on the wrist, completely changing the rules of

In the Matter of T (A Child) [2021] UKSC 35

marcuscleaver · In the Matter of T (A Child) [2021] UKSC 35 As a child in care, T required secure accommodation but funding cuts meant compromises had to be made. These compromises were authorised by way of a court order and that is what is

Using and Abusing Natural Justice – Part One

When the Conservative MP Owen Paterson was found to have abused his position for personal financial gain he responded by saying that “[t]he process I have been subjected to does not comply with natural justice.” It is an interesting allegation because the concept of natural

X v Kuoni Travel Ltd [2021] UKSC 34

marcuscleaver · X v Kuoni Travel Ltd [2021] UKSC 34 When a holiday went horribly wrong in 2010, Mrs. X decided to bring a claim against the tour operator. Many years later, and after a reference to the Court of Justice of the European Union,

Royal Mail Group Ltd v Efobi [2021] UKSC 33

marcuscleaver · Royal Mail Group Ltd v Efobi [2021] UKSC 33 An accusation of racial discrimination against Royal Mail raises interesting questions about the test to be applied in these claims. Music from bensound.com uklawweekly.substack.com/subscribe

Special Episode – Interview with law101.info

marcuscleaver · Special Episode – Interview with law101.info In this special bumper edition of the podcast I play the audio from a recent interview I gave to law101.info Music from bensound.com Visit law101.info for more.

Harcus Sinclair LLP v Your Lawyers Ltd [2021] UKSC 32

marcuscleaver · Harcus Sinclair LLP v Your Lawyers Ltd [2021] UKSC 32 When a law firm decided to collaborate with one firm instead of another, the practice that had been shunned tried to enforce a restraint of trade clause in a non-disclosure agreement. The question