marcuscleaver · Ho v Adelkun [2021] UKSC 43 After a road traffic accident between Ms Ho and Ms Adelkun there were questions about how the costs should be offset against one another. In this episode we also discuss whether the Civil Procedure Rules do more
marcuscleaver · References by the Attorney General and Advocate General for Scotland [2021] UKSC 42 Two bills from the Scottish Parliament are questioned before the Supreme Court for fear that they go beyond the legislative competence of Holyrood. Music from bensound.com uklawweekly.substack.com/subscribe
marcuscleaver · R (TN) (Vietnam) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] UKSC 41 When fast track procedure rules for asylum claims were held to be null and void questions were raised about all of the cases that were decided using those rules.
marcuscleaver · Pakistan International Airline Corporation v Times Travel (UK) Ltd [2021] UKSC 40 When can a lawful act be used to rescind a contract? In this case an estate agent was pressured into signing a new agreement with an airline but was this legitimate
marcuscleaver · Tinkler v Commissioners for HMRC [2021] UKSC 39 After HMRC concluded that Mr Tinkler owed more than £700,000 in unpaid tax he tried to argue that the original enquiry was not valid because the incorrect postal address was used. In this case the
marcuscleaver · R (A) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] UKSC 37 To what extent should guidance and policy document produced by a public authority be legally binding and challengeable by judicial review? That is the question asked of the Supreme Court
marcuscleaver · CPRE Kent v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2021] UKSC 36 This week’s episode is about what costs should be paid by a losing side for mere acknowledgement of service. We also discuss how costs should be affected in environmental
marcuscleaver · In the Matter of T (A Child) [2021] UKSC 35 As a child in care, T required secure accommodation but funding cuts meant compromises had to be made. These compromises were authorised by way of a court order and that is what is
marcuscleaver · X v Kuoni Travel Ltd [2021] UKSC 34 When a holiday went horribly wrong in 2010, Mrs. X decided to bring a claim against the tour operator. Many years later, and after a reference to the Court of Justice of the European Union,
marcuscleaver · Royal Mail Group Ltd v Efobi [2021] UKSC 33 An accusation of racial discrimination against Royal Mail raises interesting questions about the test to be applied in these claims. Music from bensound.com uklawweekly.substack.com/subscribe